Raquel Scalcon told Nexo that the attempt to abolish the law would stem from the “institutional coercion” suffered by the STF throughout Bolsonaro’s presidency, in order to restrict or prevent the full and free exercise of the functions of this jurisdictional body.
Raquel Scalcon participates in a debate on the dogmatic challenges of the Law for the Defense of the Democratic Rule of Law, at the STF Congress.
According to Raquel Scalcon, banning social media has become an increasingly common practice. The measure is applied within a principle of “general precautionary power”.
Raquel Scalcon highlights the need for the Supreme Court to set clear criteria for annulling plea deals in Brazil’s high-profile coup plot trial.
According to Raquel Scalcon, if the revealed facts are proven true, there will be grounds for Cid’s testimony to eventually be annulled.
Raquel Scalcon believes there may be different interpretations regarding which crimes parliamentary immunity protects against.
According to Raquel Scalcon, neither the Code of Criminal Procedure nor the Supreme Court’s rules require a qualified dissenting opinion, a gap filled by the justices based on the logic of proportionality.
After five years of the non-prosecution agreement (ANPP) being in effect, Raquel Scalcon points out the practical problems of the law and proposes that negotiated justice be improved.
Lawyer and criminal law professor Raquel Scalcon sees no logic in altering the severity of the penalties for the crimes themselves in the Penal Code, pointing out that they are not high.
In the Edição do Meio-dia of Jornal da Globo News, Raquel Scalcon provides a legal analysis of the preventive detention of former president Jair Bolsonaro.
On Globo News’ “Em Ponto” program, Raquel Scalcon provides a legal analysis of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the coup plot.
Raquel Scalcon believes that the former president did not violate precautionary measures